| |
1. |
OBJECTIVES OF THE ACCREDITATION PROCESS |
| |
|
The OMSB is the national body that certifies
specialists in all branches of medicine and surgery, and family medicine. One of
the OMSB's responsibilities is to survey and accredit residency programs to
ensure the ability of these programs to assist residents in acquiring the
knowledge and expertise necessary for specialty or subspecialty practice. The
OMSB surveys and evaluates all residency programs in Oman in each of its
recognized specialties and subspecialties. The accreditation process has as its
major objectives: |
| |
|
- to improve the quality of postgraduate medical education;
- to provide a means for objective assessment of residency programs;
- to provide guidance in the development of new residency programs
- to assist the scientific committees chairmen and program directors in reviewing
the conduct and educational quality of their programs.
|
| |
|
To achieve these objectives, essential elements in
each aspect of a program have been identified which must reach established
accreditation standards before the program can be accredited. The accreditation
process examines each program using information obtained through the use of
questionnaires and an on-site visit made by a team of surveyors experienced in
postgraduate medical education and familiar with the standards of the OMSB |
| |
|
| |
2. |
ORGANIZATION OF THE OMSB WITH RESPECT TO
ACCREDITATION |
| |
|
2.1. |
The Accreditation Committee |
| |
|
|
Responsibility for accrediting OMSB residency programs
is delegated to the Accreditation Committee. This Committee is composed of a
chair, vice chair and other members. All members are appointed for a three-year
term that is renewable.
The role of the Accreditation Committee is: |
| |
|
|
- To recommend policies, standards, and criteria related to the accreditation
process of residency programs.
- To arrange periodic review and assessment of accredited residency programs
through on-site surveys and internal reviews.
- Assess applications for accreditation of new residency programs or for
modification of accredited programs.
- To determine the category of accreditation granted to each residency program. To
develop, maintain, disseminate, and review its policies and procedures.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
2.2. |
Specialty Committees |
| |
|
|
The Accreditation Committee is assisted in its work by
the scientific committee of each of the specialties. The role of a scientific
committee in the accreditation process is: |
| |
|
|
- To develop and review periodically the specific standards of accreditation for
programs in the specialty or subspecialty;
- To develop and review periodically the specialty-specific portions of the
pre-survey questionnaire, which is used to obtain information on programs
applying for accreditation and on programs to be surveyed or otherwise reviewed;
- As requested by the Accreditation Committee, to nominate individuals from the
specialty or subspecialty to conduct external reviews of specific programs and
to participate in regular surveys.
|
| |
|
|
The development and monitoring of the content of the
documents "Specific Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs" in the
specialty or subspecialty and the specialty-specific portions of the pre-survey
questionnaire are a major responsibility of the respective specialty committees.
Guidelines provided by the specialty committee are particularly important in
evaluating the structure and organization of the program as well as the adequacy
of resources, the academic content and the evaluation processes of the specialty
or subspecialty. Such guidelines also assist accreditation committees to
determine the resources required to initiate and sustain a residency program in
the specialty or subspecialty. |
| |
|
|
| |
3. |
Training
Centers |
| |
|
All training centers must be accredited by OMSB
accreditation committee/ department whether for core /mandatory rotations or
elective rotations. |
| |
|
3.1 |
Sites for All Rotations |
| |
|
|
All sites must demonstrate a commitment to education
and quality patient care. The following requirements will assist OMSB in
developing, maintaining and evaluating the quality of sites for all rotations.
It is the responsibility of the OMSB accreditation committee, each residency
program scientific committee and each hospital director to: |
| |
|
|
- Maintain and continuously update records of each site including the length of
the rotation and the number of residents involved;
- Maintain written agreements with each site;
- Ensure that there are goals and objectives for each program using each site and
that all sites comply with approved objectives and standards as appropriate;
- Ensure that there is a rotation supervisor.
- Ensure that there is appropriate evaluation of each rotation by each program;
- Ensure that all sites are evaluated during the internal review of the program
|
| |
|
|
At the time of the survey, the role of the
Accreditation Committee will be to ensure that the hospital has an appropriate
system in place to maintain and evaluate the quality of the rotations in all
sites in all programs. Sites will be visited at the time of a regular survey or
at the time of internal review. Strengths and weaknesses of the sites will be
noted |
| |
|
|
|
| |
4. |
Accreditation Requirement of the Training Centers |
| |
|
Accreditation of health institutions as training
centers requires that they meet the following requirements:- |
| |
|
4.1 |
The Training Faculty |
| |
|
|
- There must be qualified faculty for training
according to the international standards by the authorized Scientific
Committee.
- The residents must be totally under the supervision of the training faculty to
assure the residents' participation in the scientific activities.
- The training faculty must carry out Instructional activities, for example,
rounds in the training centers, lectures, seminars…etc. and preparing this in an
organized way according to specialties
|
| |
|
4.2 |
Basic Services |
| |
|
|
A. |
Hospitals |
| |
|
|
|
- Main Specialties
- A&E
- Out-patient clinics
- Operation Rooms
- ICU
- Diagnostic Laboratory
- Radiology Department
- Pharmacy & Nutrition
- Medical Records
- Sufficient, on call rooms for residents
- Communication
- Any other requirements of the Accreditation Department.
|
| |
|
|
B. |
Health Centers |
| |
|
|
|
- Out-patient clinics
- Diagnostic Laboratory
- Radiology Department
- Vaccination Department
- Health Instruction Department
- Pharmacy & Nutrition
- Medical Records
- Communication
- Meeting & Teaching Rooms if available
- Any other requirements of Accreditation Department
|
| |
|
4.3 |
Training and Educational Resources. |
| |
|
|
- The medical Library which includes but not limited to:-
- The latest editions of the essential textbooks.
- The new edition of the index medicine.
- Medical Journals & Periodicals.
- Medical electronic Library
- The availability of adequate number of modern instructional aids.
- Lecture halls equipped with audiovisual aids.
- Medical Librarian.
|
| |
|
4.4 |
Accreditation Process of Training Centers. |
| |
|
|
4.4.1 |
The Accreditation Committee will visit the training centers which
apply for their accreditation for the first time. |
| |
|
|
4.4.2 |
The Accreditation Committee will pay periodical visits to the
training centers and programs in the first quarter of the training year for
evaluation. However, the first visit for the purpose of accreditation or
emergency visit may be at any time |
| |
|
|
4.4.3 |
After fulfilling the accreditation conditions, the Accreditation
Committee will study the accreditation requirements specific to each specialty
separately in the training centers. |
| |
|
|
4.4.4 |
The OMSB will review the implementation of the program
systematically. |
| |
|
|
4.4.5 |
The OMSB will evaluate the center and the scientific program every
3 years, or less if the OMSB deems it necessary, to continue accrediting them |
| |
|
|
|
| |
5. |
Accreditation Requirement of the Training Program and Faculty:- |
| |
|
The Training Programs are
- Emergency Medicine
- Anesthesia
- Child Health
- Dermatology
- FAMCO
- General Surgery
- ENT
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Internal Medicine
- Microbiology
- Biochemistry
- Hematology
- Histopathology
- Psychiatry
- Radiology
- Other added by the decision from the Board of Trustees.
For accrediting a training program, it must fulfill the following general
requirements and also the requirements pertaining to each specialty. |
| |
|
5.1. |
Curriculum |
| |
|
|
5.1.1 |
Aims & Objectives
|
| |
|
|
5.1.2 |
Outline of rotations both core and elective for all training years
|
| |
|
|
5.1.3 |
Didactic lectures and conferences for all years
|
| |
|
|
5.1.4 |
Determining graded responsibility for every training year.
|
| |
|
|
5.1.5 |
The duration of training program
|
| |
|
|
5.1.6 |
The participating and accredited Training Centers by the OMSB and
the resources used.
|
| |
|
|
5.1.7 |
The members of the teaching faculty
|
| |
|
|
5.1.8 |
Admission criteria of the program
|
| |
|
|
5.1.9 |
Number of resident posts available annually in the program for
training residents according to the available resources and international
standards.
|
| |
|
|
5.1.10 |
The required examinations if available
|
| |
|
|
5.1.11 |
Surgical techniques and procedures if applicable |
| |
|
|
5.1.12 |
Research requirements if applicable. |
| |
|
5.2. |
The Training Supervisor |
| |
|
|
5.2.1 |
There must be one Program Director responsible for the training
program. There also must be one assistant to the Program Director in every
training center assisting the Program Director |
| |
|
|
5.2.2 |
The Program Director together with his assistants and the teaching
faculty are responsible for general administration of the program and providing
a suitable academic environment for the trainees. |
| |
|
|
5.2.3 |
The Program Director and his assistants must be holders of
specialty certificate and they must have enough experience and broad knowledge
in the specialty in addition to their administrative abilities. |
| |
|
5.3. |
The Training Faculty |
| |
|
|
5.3.1 |
There must be a sufficient number of training faculty in all
training centers and they must have the qualifications which enable tem to
supervise and teach all trainees of the program. |
| |
|
|
5.3.2 |
The ration of the training faculty to the trainees must be 1
consultant : 3 trainees according to international standards
|
| |
|
|
5.3.3 |
The training faculty should dedicate enough time for the training
& teaching processes. |
| |
|
|
5.3.4 |
The training faculty must allow the trainees to attend lectures
and conferences conducted by the program and they should be at least 2 hours /
week |
| |
|
|
5.3.5 |
The training faculty must dedicate a stated time for academic
training and participate in the time designated for academic training. |
| |
|
|
5.3.6 |
The training faculty must make sure that the trainees education
and training have priority over the clinical services.
|
| |
|
|
5.3.7 |
The training faculty must show interest in teaching and training
processes in the OMSB
|
| |
|
|
5.3.8 |
The training faculty must provide a suitable environment for
trainees attendance at conferences and they must encourage research. |
| |
|
|
5.3.9 |
The training faculty must encourage the trainees to participate
in clinical discussions and clinical rounds
|
| |
|
|
5.3.10 |
The training faculty must be evaluated periodically by the
residents. |
| |
|
5.4. |
The Qualifications of the Training Faculty |
| |
|
|
5.4.1 |
Members of the training faculty must be holders of specialty
certificate of the training program. |
| |
|
|
5.4.2 |
Members of the training faculty must be experienced in the field
of academic and clinical teaching. |
| |
|
5.5. |
Number of the Trainees |
| |
|
|
The OMSB will decide the required number of trainees
in each specialty program in keeping the teaching resources available for
instructing the trainees in the training centers (for example, number of
patients, the availability of clinical materials used in instruction, the
training faculty to the trainees ratio, the budget available, and the efficiency
of the training faculty) by coordinating with the authorized institutions and
bodies. |
| |
|
5.6. |
Other Requirements for each Specialty:- |
| |
|
|
5.6.1 |
A trainee's shift must not exceed consecutive 24 hours and the
trainee should make sure that he/she hands over his/her patients to the next
training group. |
| |
|
|
5.6.2 |
The trainee may submit shift requests to the Chief Resident 2
weeks before the beginning of the rotation and the Chief Resident will look into
his/her request. |
| |
|
|
5.6.3 |
The monthly working schedule must be distributed among the
trainees at least one week prior to the beginning of the rotation and must be
sent to OMSB office in the training center. |
| |
|
|
5.6.4 |
The trainee must not take more than one in house call every 4 days |
| |
|
|
5.6.5 |
Weekend call must bee one day long – 24 hours – only |
| |
|
|
5.6.6 |
The trainee must not permitted to take more than one home call
every 3 days |
| |
|
|
| |
6. |
Freezing &
Revoking Accreditation of Training Centers and Training Programs |
| |
|
The OMSB has the right to Frees & Revoke accreditation
from the training center and training programs if they do not fulfill the
accreditation requirements and conductions according to the following steps’ |
| |
|
6.1. |
Freezing the Accreditation |
| |
|
|
6.1.1 |
Based on the recommendation of the Accreditation Committee, the
President of the Executive Board will issue a warning letter of freezing the
accreditation to the center's administration or the training program to correct
the deficiencies. The centre or program correct the deficiencies and then submit
a request for a re-evaluation within 6 months from the date of issue of the
warning letter.. |
| |
|
|
6.1.2 |
If the period of warning ends without correcting the deficiencies
for freezing the accreditation of the center, the training program will continue
for another six months until the deficiencies are corrected and the
Accreditation Committee will evaluate the centre or the training program again |
| |
|
6.2. |
Revoking the Accreditation |
| |
|
|
6.2.1 |
In case the above mentioned freezing of accreditation period ends
without correcting the deficiencies, the accreditation will be revoked. |
| |
|
|
6.2.2 |
Revoking accreditation may result in not allowing the admission of
new residents and transferring all residents to other centers. |
| |
|
|
6.2.3 |
Re-accreditation of the centre or the training program will be
based on a letter from the center's administration or the training program that
shows the correction of deficiencies and application for re – accreditation |
| |
|
|
6.2.4 |
Revoking accreditation may be immediate, especially in case of
severe deficiencies in the centre or the training program and if the
deficiencies cannot be corrected within a short period |
| |
|
|
| |
7. |
The
Accreditation Process |
| |
|
The accreditation process is based on a system of
regular surveys of the residency programs on a three year cycle. However, the
survey will be done annually initially, until the programs are well established.
The primary purpose of a survey is to provide the Accreditation Committee and
the Executive Board and Board of Trustees of OMSB with a first-hand evaluation
of each accredited program and the extent to which it meets the standards of
accreditation. The accreditation committee will send a team of surveyors to
assess the Specialty Program and Training Centers. |
| |
|
7.1. |
Regular Surveys |
| |
|
|
There are a number of checks and balances in the
survey and accreditation of residency programs with respect to the accuracy of
information and the process of deliberations and decision-making. In brief: |
| |
|
|
7.1.1 |
The training centers provides the pre-survey information which
will include a covering letter from the Head of Department indicating that the
faculty approves and supports this program plus covering letters from the
Hospital Directors of the major teaching institutions or training centers
indicating support of the program |
| |
|
|
7.1.2 |
The accreditation committee reviews the documentation and provides
comments prior to the survey; |
| |
|
|
7.1.3 |
The surveyor examines the program in interviews with the chairman
and program director, teaching staff, residents, and with the residency program
committee. In addition, the surveyor tours the facilities and reviews the
resources available to the program; |
| |
|
|
7.1.4 |
The surveyor meets with the chairman and the program director
prior to the departure of the survey team to clarify any issues; |
| |
|
|
7.1.5 |
The surveyor submits a written report |
| |
|
|
7.1.6 |
The Accreditation Committee reviews the pre-survey documentation,
the survey report and recommends the category of accreditation |
| |
|
|
7.1.7 |
The accreditation committee will submit the report to the
Executive Board and the Board of Trustees for approval |
| |
|
|
7.1.8 |
The Board of Trustees will notify the Specialty Program and the
training centers of the status of accreditation |
| |
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
7.2. |
Internal Review of Residency Programs |
| |
|
|
Direct responsibility for the quality of the specialty
programs rests with the scientific committee, the chairman and program
directors. The internal review, which is considered to be an integral component
of the accreditation process, should be conducted annually. It is intended as a
mechanism to assist residency program in maintaining its quality and to provide
the accreditation committee, chairman and program directors with valuable
information about the strengths and weaknesses of their programs. This in turn
enables the scientific committee to take corrective measures before the next
OMSB survey. It is recommended that repeat internal reviews be conducted on
programs with serious identified weaknesses |
| |
|
|
7.2.1. |
The Objective of the internal review are |
| |
|
|
|
- To assess the strengths and weakness of each program
- To consider and evaluate all residency education training centers, including
elective experiences
|
| |
|
|
7.2.2. |
The internal review team for each program should include |
| |
|
|
|
- Chairman and members of the accreditation sub-committee, program director and
chairman of the program scientific committee
- To Chairman or program director from another specialty
- Members of the accreditation committee should also be included
|
| |
|
|
The review team should have available all
documentation regarding the program. A series of interviews must take place with
the chairman program director, teaching staff, residents, and with the
scientific program committee. Visits to individual sites should take place as
appropriate. All residency education sites and elective experiences should be
reviewed by the internal review team. There should be a careful assessment of
the quality of the program, based on the general and specific standards of
accreditation as outlined by the OMSB |
| |
|
|
A separate written report from the residents in the
program should be included. This report should be prepared by the resident
representative(s) commenting on: |
| |
|
|
- strengths of the program,
- weaknesses previously identified in the program and the residents’ perception of
how well these have been dealt with,
- Any other significant changes in the program since the last review.
|
| |
|
|
The written report of the internal review should
include the strengths and weaknesses of the program and specific recommendations
for continued development and improvements. This report should be submitted to
the Accreditation Committee Chairman and Executive Board. The report should then
be circulated to the members of the scientific committee and discussed at their
meeting |
| |
|
|
Internal review reports of all programs are to be
provided to the survey team prior to the regular OMSB survey to enable them to
assess the efficacy of the internal review process. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
7.3 |
External Reviews. |
| |
|
|
In addition to the regularly scheduled surveys, the
Accreditation Committee may, from time to time, request that an external review
of a residency program be conducted when there are serious concerns regarding
the ability of the program to meet the standards of accreditation. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
8. |
CATEGORIES OF ACCREDITATION |
| |
|
Each program considered by the Accreditation Committee
is granted an accreditation status or category of accreditation outline below: |
| |
|
- New program are given “New approval
- Continuing program without deficiencies are given “Full Accreditation”.
- Programs that have deficiency may be given accreditation with warning or
probationary accreditation.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
8.1. |
Approval |
| |
|
|
Programs that are considered to meet the general and
specific standards of accreditation and which have no major weaknesses
identified are granted approval |
| |
|
8.2. |
Conditional Approval |
| |
|
|
When a program is considered to meet the general and
specific standard of accreditation and have some weaknesses that can be
corrected within 1 year before the next scheduled survey, it is granted
provisional approval. It then becomes the responsibility of the scientific
committee to correct the weaknesses in the program within the first year.
The Accreditation Committee may mandate follow-up of a program with conditional
approval by means of a regular survey
|
| |
|
8.3. |
Probation Status |
| |
|
|
When major and/or continuing weaknesses have been
identified which bring into question the ongoing accreditation of the program,
the program will be placed on probation for one year. Residents and applicants
to the program, must be advised immediately by the program director of the
status of the program. Within one year of such notice being given, regular
survey will be conducted. |
| |
|
8.4. |
Freezing Accreditation of Training Centers and
Training Programs |
| |
|
|
The OMSB has the right to freeze accreditation from
the training centre and training programs if they do not fulfill the
accreditation requirements and conditions according to the following steps: |
| |
|
|
8.4.1 |
After the program has been on probation for one year with
continuing deficiencies which have not been corrected, a notice of intent of
freezing will be sent. |
| |
|
|
8.4.2 |
The specialty program corrects the deficiencies can submit a
request for a re-evaluation within one year from the date of issue of the
warning letter. |
| |
|
|
8.4.3 |
New residents will not be accepted in the program. |
| |
|
8.5. |
Withdrawal of the Accreditation |
| |
|
|
8.5.1 |
A program on "Freeze status" for one year without correcting the
deficiencies, withdrawal of the accreditation will take place |
| |
|
|
8.5.2 |
If a program is on "Withdrawal Status" all residents will have to
be transferred to other programs if available. |
| |
|
|
8.5.3 |
Re-accreditation of the centre or the training program will be
based on a letter from the training program that shows the correction of
deficiencies and application for re – accreditation. |
| |
|
|
8.5.4 |
Revoking accreditation may be immediate, especially in case of
severe deficiencies in the training centre or the training program and if the
deficiencies cannot be corrected within a short period. |
| |
|
8.6. |
New Approval |
| |
|
|
An acceptable application for a new program is granted
new approval. After 3 years of a resident being enrolled in the program, the
accreditation committee can change the category to full
accreditation category if the program is established. |
| |
|
8.7. |
Application For Accreditation Of New Programs |
| |
|
|
The specialty program requesting accreditation of a
new residency program should follow the following steps: |
| |
|
|
8.7.1 |
The new residency program must apply by means of a special forms
supplied by the OMSB |
| |
|
|
8.7.2 |
To be accredited, a program must comply with the OMSB Program and
Training Center “General Standards”. |
| |
|
|
8.7.3 |
Recommend specific standards of accreditation for the specialty
and sub-specialty. |
| |
|
|
8.7.4 |
Accreditation Committee will appoint a new program sub-committee
to consider the application. |
| |
|
|
8.7.5 |
Accreditation will be granted on the basis of an assessment of the
resources to be provided within the program and the capability of the program to
provide a complete education program in the specialty or sub-specialty as well
as the manner in which these resources will be utilized for the residency
education. |
| |
|
|
8.7.6 |
Completed application forms and a covering letter from the Head of
Department of the proposed specialty indicating that the faculty approves and
support this program plus covering letter from the Hospital Directors of the
major teaching institutions or training centers indicating support of the
program must be submitted to OMSB |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |